Slane Veterinary Clinic

Slane Veterinary Clinic is not described as part of a corporate group in the information available to us. The reviews suggest the team sees a lot of dogs (and also cats), including cases that involve diagnostics and surgical treatment: one owner says their dog’s life was saved after an “outside the box” diagnosis followed by immediate treatment, with tests later confirming it. Multiple reviewers also specifically mention surgery and trust in vet “Frances” for surgical work. One recent review raises a serious concern about an orthopaedic outcome after a repeat procedure on another leg, alongside a dispute about whether stitches were resorbable and ongoing difficulties getting invoices suitable for insurance—so experiences appear mostly very positive, but not uniform.

Services

Services and capabilities mentioned in the latest reviews include

• •Veterinary consultations for dogs and cats (several owners refer to ongoing care for multiple pets).
• •Diagnostic workups/testing (one review describes tests confirming a diagnosis after immediate treatment).
• •Surgical procedures (owners explicitly mention “pet surgery”; one negative review describes a cruciate-related issue and stitch type being disputed).
• •Treatment requiring injections (mentioned in the context of post-op complications in one review).
• •Paperwork for pet insurance claims/invoicing (raised as a problem in one review).

People

• •Frances (vet): Mentioned repeatedly by name. Owners describe long-term attendance (“since 2010”), trust in her for surgery, and a case where she made an unusual diagnosis and treated immediately, with later tests backing it up.
• •Fiona (staff member): Named positively alongside Frances in a review praising “highest standards.”
• •One reviewer also refers to an unnamed Spanish staff member in connection with the disputed stitch information and post-op outcome; this is presented as a negative experience.

Reviews

Google rating: 4.8 stars from 138 reviews. - Repeat custom and long-term relationships are common (one owner says they’ve attended Frances since 2010).

• •Specific “high-stakes” wins are described: one owner says their dog would have died without the clinic’s diagnosis and immediate treatment, later confirmed by tests.
• •Surgery is a recurring topic: several owners say they trust Frances for operations; one owner reports a poor outcome after repeat treatment on another leg and says two other vets backed up their concerns.
• •Administration is mostly not discussed, but one review alleges prolonged difficulties obtaining invoices acceptable for insurance claims.