Dog & Cat Vets in Clones

## Summary Liam Strain Veterinary Clinic has a 4.7★ Google rating from 23 reviews. The website source available to us doesn’t provide a clinic-specific service list, so the clearest picture comes from owner feedback: people repeatedly mention a friendly, accommodating team, with a couple of reviews also commenting that costs felt “not too expensive”/“reasonably priced.” One review specifically thanks the clinic for help with a cat. ## Services Based on the written reviews available to us, the clinic provides general veterinary care (including care for cats). No specific procedures (e.g., surgery, dentistry, diagnostics, vaccinations) are described in the available sources. ## People - **Liam (vet)**: mentioned by name in reviews, described as “a good vet.” Other comments focus more on personal familiarity than on clinical details. - **Team/staff (unnamed)**: repeatedly described as **friendly** and **accommodating**, with multiple reviewers using similar wording (“very friendly,” “always accommodating,” “friendly and professional staff”). ## Reviews **Google rating: 4.7★ from 23 reviews.** The written reviews we can see are short and mostly focus on overall experience rather than specific treatments. **“Themes below are drawn from the latest written reviews available to us.”** - Multiple owners highlight a **friendly, welcoming service**, often repeating the same phrasing (“great friendly service”). - Several mention the clinic being **accommodating** (implying flexibility when arranging care). - A couple of reviews mention **pricing felt reasonable** (“not too expensive,” “reasonably priced”), without any specific amounts. - One reviewer specifically thanks the clinic for help **with their cat**.

## Summary G O'Gorman Veterinary Clinic has limited publicly available detail beyond Google reviews, which include both strong praise and sharp criticism. The written feedback specifically references: - **Euthanasia care**, with one reviewer describing a “very distressing” experience for the pet and owners that they felt was “handled very badly” by **Mr O’Gorman**. - Several other reviewers giving brief but clearly positive endorsements (for example “Absolutely brillant vets… highly recommend” and “Very good…”), including a thank-you to **Gerrard**. Overall, the available reviews show a **clear split**: multiple 5-star ratings alongside serious 1-star complaints about how an end-of-life appointment was managed. ## Services Only the following is explicitly mentioned in the available written reviews: - **Euthanasia / end-of-life appointment** (one reviewer reports a very negative experience with how it was carried out). ## People - **Mr O’Gorman**: Named in a 1-star review concerning a euthanasia appointment, described by the reviewer as being handled badly and causing distress. - **Gerrard**: Thanked by name in a 5-star review (“thank u so much gerrard..”), suggesting at least one client had a notably positive experience with his care. ## Reviews **3.9 stars from 7 reviews.** The written comments we can see are brief overall, but include both very positive recommendations and strongly negative experiences. **“Themes below are drawn from the latest written reviews available to us.”** - **Positive experiences (5-star):** short endorsements such as “Absolutely brillant vets… highly recommend” and “Very good,” with one reviewer thanking **Gerrard** by name. - **Negative experiences (1-star):** serious complaints focused on **euthanasia**, described as distressing and poorly handled; another reviewer calls the vet “appalling” and advises others to go elsewhere.