Showing 31-40 of 47 clinics
Brittas Veterinary Clinic is part of Brittas Veterinary Hospital, an exclusively small-animal practice that’s been providing care for 30+ years and also offers pet grooming. From the latest reviews available, owners most often describe routine and minor surgical care: one dog was spayed, microchipped, and had a growth removed, with the owner noting she was “a little groggy” after procedures but back to normal by the next day. Several reviews also focus on how the team handles temperament—one owner says their nervous dog is managed well, and another mentions their dog walks in willingly. A smaller set of reviews raise a concern about pricing and follow-up: one reviewer felt costs were excessive compared with shopping around and says they didn’t receive a requested call back.
Brittas Veterinary Clinic is part of Brittas Veterinary Hospital, an exclusively small-animal practice that’s been providing care for 30+ years and also offers pet grooming. From the latest reviews available, owners most often describe routine and minor surgical care: one dog was spayed, microchipped, and had a growth removed, with the owner noting she was “a little groggy” after procedures but back to normal by the next day. Several reviews also focus on how the team handles temperament—one owner says their nervous dog is managed well, and another mentions their dog walks in willingly. A smaller set of reviews raise a concern about pricing and follow-up: one reviewer felt costs were excessive compared with shopping around and says they didn’t receive a requested call back.
Corcoran Veterinary appears to be an independent practice (no corporate group is named in the available information). Based on the limited written feedback available, it seems set up primarily for routine small-animal care, with multiple reviewers describing help when a dog was unwell and generally “great veterinary services.” Reviews repeatedly name Jim (praised for how he handles dogs) and Sandra on reception (mentioned for being welcoming/helpful). One reviewer also mentions “reasonable prices”, but no actual fees are given.
Corcoran Veterinary appears to be an independent practice (no corporate group is named in the available information). Based on the limited written feedback available, it seems set up primarily for routine small-animal care, with multiple reviewers describing help when a dog was unwell and generally “great veterinary services.” Reviews repeatedly name Jim (praised for how he handles dogs) and Sandra on reception (mentioned for being welcoming/helpful). One reviewer also mentions “reasonable prices”, but no actual fees are given.
Damer Veterinary Clinic is a general veterinary practice with reviews describing both routine care and surgical treatment. Recent feedback includes owners thanking the team for “sorting me out” and one owner describing their dog’s surgery and aftercare as “amazing.” However, a separate recent review strongly warns others to “check everything going on and ask the questions,” stating their young cat died at the clinic—so experiences reported are mixed and include a serious negative outcome. Concrete details mentioned by owners include: - Surgery performed on a small dog, with the clinic described as looking after the pet throughout. - Comments about staff being attentive and efficient during visits. - One owner specifically notes they “were not charged a fortune for what had to be done” (no exact prices given). - A recent allegation of a cat dying while under the clinic’s care, alongside a warning to ask questions and monitor what’s happening.
Damer Veterinary Clinic is a general veterinary practice with reviews describing both routine care and surgical treatment. Recent feedback includes owners thanking the team for “sorting me out” and one owner describing their dog’s surgery and aftercare as “amazing.” However, a separate recent review strongly warns others to “check everything going on and ask the questions,” stating their young cat died at the clinic—so experiences reported are mixed and include a serious negative outcome. Concrete details mentioned by owners include: - Surgery performed on a small dog, with the clinic described as looking after the pet throughout. - Comments about staff being attentive and efficient during visits. - One owner specifically notes they “were not charged a fortune for what had to be done” (no exact prices given). - A recent allegation of a cat dying while under the clinic’s care, alongside a warning to ask questions and monitor what’s happening.
Castlepark Stud is a horse-focused veterinary and stud setup specialising in mares and foals, with a purpose-built foaling unit. The website describes foaling, veterinary assistance, and boarding, with stated specialties in reproduction and neonatology (newborn foal care). Google reviews are very positive overall (4.9/5 from 8 reviews), though the latest written comments available to us are brief (e.g., “Great place”, “Stupendous”) and don’t describe specific clinical outcomes.
Castlepark Stud is a horse-focused veterinary and stud setup specialising in mares and foals, with a purpose-built foaling unit. The website describes foaling, veterinary assistance, and boarding, with stated specialties in reproduction and neonatology (newborn foal care). Google reviews are very positive overall (4.9/5 from 8 reviews), though the latest written comments available to us are brief (e.g., “Great place”, “Stupendous”) and don’t describe specific clinical outcomes.
Anthony Ryan MVB appears to be a small veterinary practice focused on routine companion-animal care, with reviews most often referencing dogs and general “pet care” rather than specialist procedures. Based on the latest written feedback available, owners repeatedly mention getting practical advice, an empathetic manner during visits, and a clinic environment described as “spotless clean.”
Anthony Ryan MVB appears to be a small veterinary practice focused on routine companion-animal care, with reviews most often referencing dogs and general “pet care” rather than specialist procedures. Based on the latest written feedback available, owners repeatedly mention getting practical advice, an empathetic manner during visits, and a clinic environment described as “spotless clean.”
Meagher Veterinary Surgeons (also described on its website as “Kedrah Veterinary Clinic”) presents itself as a specialised equine clinic, established in 1977 by veterinary surgeon Thomas P. Meagher (MVB, MRCVS). The written reviews available mostly match that focus: multiple owners specifically mention horse treatment and describe the clinic as a “top class equine vet clinic,” with “friendly staff.” One older review pulls in a different direction, commenting that it’s “more of a hotel for dogs and cats,” which conflicts with the clinic’s equine-specialist positioning.
Meagher Veterinary Surgeons (also described on its website as “Kedrah Veterinary Clinic”) presents itself as a specialised equine clinic, established in 1977 by veterinary surgeon Thomas P. Meagher (MVB, MRCVS). The written reviews available mostly match that focus: multiple owners specifically mention horse treatment and describe the clinic as a “top class equine vet clinic,” with “friendly staff.” One older review pulls in a different direction, commenting that it’s “more of a hotel for dogs and cats,” which conflicts with the clinic’s equine-specialist positioning.
Nessan O'Gorman Veterinary is listed on Google with a 5.0-star rating from 1 review. Beyond that rating, there isn’t enough available information here (no website summary and no readable review text) to describe what the clinic is set up for, what services it offers, or what clients specifically experienced.
Nessan O'Gorman Veterinary is listed on Google with a 5.0-star rating from 1 review. Beyond that rating, there isn’t enough available information here (no website summary and no readable review text) to describe what the clinic is set up for, what services it offers, or what clients specifically experienced.
MQ Veterinary Services appears to be a small equine-focused veterinary service (described by reviewers as “an equine vet”), with call-out work referenced in reviews. The clearest decision-relevant details owners mention are rapid attendance (“attended the call immediately”), clear explanations of what was happening/being done, and an attentive approach during the visit. Reviews also include strong, but non-specific, endorsements such as “Absolutely best around.”
MQ Veterinary Services appears to be a small equine-focused veterinary service (described by reviewers as “an equine vet”), with call-out work referenced in reviews. The clearest decision-relevant details owners mention are rapid attendance (“attended the call immediately”), clear explanations of what was happening/being done, and an attentive approach during the visit. Reviews also include strong, but non-specific, endorsements such as “Absolutely best around.”
Moyne Veterinary Centre has a 5.0-star Google rating, but the information available to us doesn’t include any written review text or website details describing its facilities, team, or services. Based on the inputs provided, there isn’t enough evidence to say what types of cases the clinic is set up for beyond general veterinary care.
Moyne Veterinary Centre has a 5.0-star Google rating, but the information available to us doesn’t include any written review text or website details describing its facilities, team, or services. Based on the inputs provided, there isn’t enough evidence to say what types of cases the clinic is set up for beyond general veterinary care.
Cosima Walsh Veterinary Surgeon is listed as a veterinary practice, but the information provided here is very limited: no website summary, no described facilities, and no details on the types of cases handled. No corporate group affiliation is stated in the available data. The only feedback signal available is a Google rating of 3.0 based on 1 review, with no written comments to explain what went well or poorly.
Cosima Walsh Veterinary Surgeon is listed as a veterinary practice, but the information provided here is very limited: no website summary, no described facilities, and no details on the types of cases handled. No corporate group affiliation is stated in the available data. The only feedback signal available is a Google rating of 3.0 based on 1 review, with no written comments to explain what went well or poorly.