Farm & Large-Animal Vets near Banagher

## Summary Banagher Vet Clinic is a general veterinary practice with a Facebook presence. Reviews describe routine visits (including a puppy’s first appointment) as well as treatment for ongoing issues such as recurrent ear infections; one reviewer reports their dog’s long-running ear problem was “cleared up” after being seen here. There’s a sharp conflict in experiences: two 1‑star reviews allege negligence during an emergency situation (including that an emergency vet had been called out), while multiple 5‑star reviews describe responsive care and positive outcomes. Concrete details mentioned by reviewers include: - Treatment for a recurrent ear infection that a client says was successfully resolved. - A puppy’s first visit described as friendly and professional, with COVID guidelines in place at the time. - An emergency situation mentioned in a negative review, with the client alleging the clinic did not take it seriously. ## Services Services and scenarios explicitly referenced in the available information include: - Assessment and treatment of recurrent ear infections in an older dog (reported as resolved by the treating vet). - Routine pet appointments (e.g., a puppy’s first visit). - Emergency care involvement is mentioned in one negative review (the reviewer says an emergency vet had been called out), but no clinic emergency/out-of-hours policy is stated. ## People - **Ollie** (role not stated; described as the person who treated a dog): One reviewer credits Ollie with getting a recurrent ear infection “on top of it” and clearing it up, leading to a noticeable improvement in the dog’s comfort and demeanor. ## Reviews **Google rating: 4.5 stars from 34 reviews.** **“Themes below are drawn from the latest written reviews available to us.”** - Several reviewers describe staff as friendly/professional and say pets were “looked after,” including during a puppy’s first visit. - A specific positive outcome is reported for treatment of a recurrent ear infection, described as finally clearing up. - Pricing is mentioned once as “realistic,” but no figures are provided. - There is serious negative feedback from one author (posted twice) alleging negligence and lack of urgency in an emergency situation, with the reviewer attributing this to a fatal outcome.